IVERMECTIN/PROPHYLACTIC DOCTOR FLORIDA

Hi; Anyone know a Doctor in Florida that prescribes Ivermectin as a Prophylactic? 

39replies Oldest first
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Active threads
  • Popular
    • Karl
    • Karl.1
    • 3 yrs ago
    • Reported - view

    Have not heard that Ivermectin is used for longevity. Have you seen a study on it?

    Like
    • JGC
    • Retired Professor of Physics
    • JGC
    • 3 yrs ago
    • Reported - view

    Which do you have: worms or head lice?

    Like 1
  • I ordered mine from the same place I ordered my life extension drugs, overseas.

    Like 1
    • Jimmy2
    • Jimmy2
    • 3 yrs ago
    • Reported - view

    For those skeptical of Ivermectin as a treatment. This site with an analysis of 982 studies has been banned on FB, YouTube, etc: https://c19early.com/

    Like
    • JGC
    • Retired Professor of Physics
    • JGC
    • 3 yrs ago
    • Reported - view

    Read the WP Article, which contains a link to the Brazilian study.

    Like
      • Jimmy2
      • Jimmy2
      • 3 yrs ago
      • Reported - view

      JGC There is a paywall.  That is why I asked you for a link to the study.  I'd rather have a link than read WP which is an interpretation of the actual study.

      Like 1
      • JGC
      • Retired Professor of Physics
      • JGC
      • 3 yrs ago
      • Reported - view
      • Jimmy2
      • Jimmy2
      • 3 yrs ago
      • Reported - view

      JGC Ok, I read through the article.  There is only one sentence in it claiming a Brazil study equates ivermectin to a placebo.  And it also says the study has not "formally published it's findings" so there is no way to look for it.  So the WP article has no direct information whatsoever.

      Also, they quote Dr. Boulware who I believe is highly biased.  He was the researcher who did the "RCT" on Hydroxychloroquine and claimed it didn't work.  I read through his HCQ study and they way he collected data was very flawed.  He made an online form that asked people if they had symptoms of covid, and mailed either a placebo or HCQ to them.  By the time the  HCQ arrived it was 3+ days after the symptoms and would most likely be administered in the late phase.  This is like having an online survey and relying on it for medical advice.  Online surveys are notorious for having unreliable data.

      Like 1
    • JGC This WP article is not accurate. I am not sure exactly why, but its obvious there is a clear effort in the media to hide the truth about ivermectin because it is very clear that it works. The only article I have seen by mainstream media was an op-ed in the wall street journal. 

      Why Is the FDA Attacking a Safe, Effective Drug?

      https://www.wsj.com/articles/fda-ivermectin-covid-19-coronavirus-masks-anti-science-11627482393

       

      Go straight to the studies and avoid opinion pieces. Watch doctors testimony that have used it. They will tell you the truth.

      https://ivmmeta.com/

      https://c19early.com/

      Like 1
    • Karl
    • Karl.1
    • 3 yrs ago
    • Reported - view

    The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unreliable

    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-021-01535-y

    Like
      • Jimmy2
      • Jimmy2
      • 3 yrs ago
      • Reported - view

      Karl If you go through each of the references, there is only one reference that attempts to back up their claim that ivermectin is unreliable, which is #4.  #4 is a newspaper article that quotes the author of the editorial.  A newspaper article is not a reliable source of information.

      So, we have at least four scientific papers that is referenced in the article that supports the use of Ivermectin, and a letter to the editor that tries to refute it with a reference to a newspaper link to the Guardian?  If the editor is actually serious he should have a counter-paper of his own that counteracts the data.

      Look at the data.

      Like 1
    • Karl So go watch the doctors testimonies that have used it. They will clearly tell you it works.

      Like 2
      • Karl
      • Karl.1
      • 3 yrs ago
      • Reported - view

      Fred Cloud don’t confuse coincidence with causation.

      Like
    • Karl I am not confusing anything. They used a control group. Did you read any of the studies?

      Like 1
      • Karl
      • Karl.1
      • 3 yrs ago
      • Reported - view

      Fred Cloud my apology. I thought you were referring to doctors in Florida giving their personal accounts.

       

      as for studies, show me a large randomized double blind study done in the U.S.  I don’t think any have been completed yet.

      Like
    • Karl you would only take it if you saw a large double blind in the US? Why?

      Like
      • Karl
      • Karl.1
      • 3 yrs ago
      • Reported - view

      Fred Cloud any treatment study needs to be randomized and double blind to be of significant value.

      Prefer US to avoid possibility that the Ivermectin is treating undiagnosed co-infection.

      With any illness with such a low mortality rate, the study needs to have very large number of patients to be statistically accurate.

      Like
    • Karl  Yeah with a larger study you will get something more statistically accurate but the need for that is only if you have a low enough response rate in these smaller studies compared to placebo that is casting doubt on efficacy. But if you look at the those studies, they show a very high rate of response, not just a tiny blip that could be noise that would justify needing a larger study sample size to flush out the noise and try to find a signal. The meta analysis takes those smaller studies and emulates a larger sample size and it confirms that is shows clear signal. So I am confused what you would want a larger study to show you.

      Like
      • David H
      • David_Hanson
      • 3 yrs ago
      • Reported - view

      Karl HaHa,- try getting large double blinded studies on humans done in the USA for a drug or supplement that can't be patented.  None have ever been done using rapamycin.   Big Pharma wasted loads of time to create everlimos (which just has a slight change in the rapamycin molecule) so it could be patented).  It makes me upset when a Doc complains about no double blinded study on a substance that can't be patented.  We as a people are being robbed of years of lives because of the FDA and Big PHARMA!   American citizens should throw the bums out of Congress.  Congress created the FDA and has become Big Pharma's laptop so they are to blame.

      Like 2
    • Please do not blame  the FDA or any government agency as they do only what the politicians want-- and this is what the lobbyists desire on behalf of their clients. Our government is bought and paid for by special interests.  Just check out climate change or insulin selling for $12 k/year. 

      Like 3
      • Karl
      • Karl.1
      • 3 yrs ago
      • Reported - view

      David H Respectable studies are underway in both The U.K. And U.S. to look at Ivermectin.  We’ll see if it works or is another Hydroxychloroquine?

      Like
      • David H
      • David_Hanson
      • 3 yrs ago
      • Reported - view

      Karl "Respectable" studies or ones set up to fail so as not to harm Big Pharma? 

      Like 1
Like Follow
  • 3 yrs agoLast active
  • 39Replies
  • 213Views
  • 9 Following