The conventional CVD/lipid hypothesis: challenged
The conventional mainstream lipid hypothesis suggests high cholesterol is directly associated with elevated CVD risk. High plasma cholesterol diffuses into the endothelial space via the LUMEN, and initiates atherosclerosis.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lipid_hypothesis
There are many fallacies of this mainstream theory.
A very LITTLE known paper from 2012 actually proves that CVD initiates from the INSIDE, namely, the adventitial vasa vasorum, and NOT the interior lumen side!
Neovascularization of coronary tunica intima (DIT) is the cause of coronary atherosclerosis. Lipoproteins invade coronary intima via neovascularization from adventitial vasa vasorum, but not from the arterial lumen: a hypothesis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3492120/pdf/1742-4682-9-11.pdf
Summary
(1) A hypotheses underlining our efforts to approach coronary atherosclerosis must
be consistent with undisputed facts concerning the subject. Furthermore, a hypothesis
should incorporate logical evaluation, and not contradict established and proven
concepts in biology and medicine without well-grounded reasons.
(2) Atherosclerosis occurs in arteries with normal DIT, while sparing the rest of
arterial bed. However, while normal DIT exists in numerous arteries [120,194], some
of these are never affected by atherosclerosis; coronary arteries are almost always the
target. On logical grounds, an arterial disease that never affects some arteries but
usually affects certain others is not systemic.
(3) Coronary atherosclerosis is not an inflammatory disease, as multiple clinical trials
demonstrate no correlation between anti-inflammatory therapies and risk of disease.
(4) High LDL levels are not a fundamental cause of coronary atherosclerosis, as
lowering such levels protects only 30-40% of those at risk. Furthermore, humans and
animals with normal LDL levels can suffer from coronary atherosclerosis.
(5) Neovascularization of the normally avascular DIT is the obligatory condition for
coronary atherosclerosis development. This neovascularization originates from
adventitial vasa vasorum and vascularizes the outer part of the coronary DIT, where
LDL deposition initially occurs.
(6) It is suggested that excessive cell replication in DIT is a cause of DIT
enlargement. Participation of enhanced matrix deposition is also plausible. An increase
in DIT dimension impairs nutrient diffusion from the coronary lumen, causing
ischemia of cells in the outer part of coronary DIT.
(7) Ischemia of the outer DIT induces angiogenesis and neovascularization from
adventitial vasa vasorum. The newly formed vascular bed terminates in the outer part
of the coronary DIT, above the internal elastic membrane, and consists of permeable
vasculature.
(8) The outer part of the coronary DIT is rich in proteoglycan biglycan, which has a
high binding capacity for LDL-C. While in avascular DIT, biglycan has very limited
access to LDL-C due to diffusion distance and LDL-C properties; after
neovascularization of the outer DIT, proteoglycan biglycan acquires access to LDL-C
particles, and extracts and retains them.
(9) Initial lipoprotein influx and deposition occurs from the neovasculature
originating from adventitial vasa vasorum - and not from the arterial lumen.
(10) Although lipoprotein deposition in the outer part of the coronary DIT is the
earliest pathological manifestation of coronary atherosclerosis, intimal
neovascularization from adventitial vasa vasorum must precede it.
-----
I will posit that it's INSULIN RESISTANCE that is the core initiation of this neovascularization.
https://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search?q=subbotin
"There are several things which spring to mind about DIT, insulin and oxygenation. If, as I think likely, a general thickening occurs under the effect of chronic hyperinsulinaemia acting on the ILGF-1 receptors which are on the lookout for platelets, we have a reason why insulin, not glucose, drives CVD. Anything which hastens thickening of the tunica intima hastens CVD. Insulin"
-
I am not a doctor, cannot give you specific medical advice. I personally would exhaust all lifestyle interventions (cardio exercise #1 by far, diet with a heavy skew towards low glucose profile, some type fasting intervention, healthy BMI, smoking cessation) before EVER considering a pharma intervention like statins. "Prevention" is the mantra, bypassing the need for "treatment". Are you concerned about CVD? Have you had a CCAC (coronary calcium scan) test done? How about an inclined treadmill test?